Appendix

This report’s findings are based on research conducted by Highspring in spring 2025.

The primary aim was to validate organizational agility as a distinct, critical factor influencing business outcomes and employee experiences—not interchangeable with performance but correlated to it.

The study sought to:

↗ Confirm that agility correlates with better business and employee outcomes.

↗ Demonstrate that investing in agility produces greater benefits than focusing solely on performance.

↗ Highlight the agility gap in high-performing but rigid organizations.

Design:

The study was built around three diagnostic frameworks:

1 | Agility Index

2 | Organizational performance diagnostic

3 | Key measurable business metrics

Respondent makeup:

The study included 517 total respondents with purchase decision-making responsibility in talent, consulting, and managed services.

Company size and revenue

Industry

List of additional industries (Other)

Agriculture

Automotive

Behavioral Health and Psychiatric Services

Construction

Customer Service

Education

Engineering

Entertainment and Sports

Energy and Energy Services

Event Management and Production

Government

Health and Wellness

Higher Education

Insurance

International Development

Legal

Logistics

Nonprofit and Not-for-profit

Performing Arts

Professional Services

Public Utility and Utility Construction

Real Estate

Research and Social Science Research

Resorts and Theme Parks

Restaurants

Security

Software

Telecom and Telecommunications

Data collection areas

↗ Organizational demographics (size, revenue, industry)

↗ Respondent role and purchasing involvement

↗ Agility, performance, and measurable organizational outcome

Analysis approach

↗ Statistical analysis, including correlation measurement (r ≈ 0.845) between agility and performance

↗ Cross-segment comparisons (e.g., SMB vs. Mid-market vs. Enterprise)

↗ Industry-specific cuts (Private Equity, Technology, Healthcare, Financial Services)

Definitions used

Organizational agility

Definition: Momentum, balance, and control at the moment of changing direction.

What we measured

↗ Speed of decision-making and problem-solving

↗ Adaptation to new challenges and opportunities

↗ Communication effectiveness

↗ Ability to scale and manage resources

↗ Departmental siloing

Agility Index metrics

↗ A1–A12 scores ranging from -30 to +30

↗ Dimensions include reaction times to problems, reorienting to change, acting on feedback, proactive opportunity identification, updating processes and tech, and scaling abilities.

Agility bands

Band
Score range
Description
Very High Agility
21+
Embedded agility, thriving on change
High Agility
11-20
Strong agility practices
Average Agility
0-10
Inconsistent agility
Low Agility
≤0
Rigid, reactive

Organizational performance

Definition: Organizational alignment, execution, and impact that’s measured in outcomes, not effort.

What we measured

↗ Employee alignment to goals

↗ Role clarity

↗ Psychological safety

↗ Trust and communication quality

↗ Diversity and inclusion

↗ Continuous development

↗ Leadership quality

↗ Customer success

↗ Employee retention

Performance diagnostic metrics

We set Highspring’s definition of agility against a diagnostic for measuring the prevalence of high-performance culture in organizations.

This diagnostic consisted of 15 questions and measured widely accepted aspects of performance validated in existing organizational research and thought leadership.

These included:

↗ Employee alignment with and commitment to company goals

↗ Role clarity

↗ High-quality interactions

↗ Psychological safety

↗ Diversity

↗ Continuous development

↗ Strong leadership

↗ Customer success

↗ Employee affinity and retention

Our objective in incorporating high-performance culture into this study was to ground our novel notion of agility against a more commonly understood and accepted interpretation of organizational success. We also sought to validate that the presence of high-performance cultures did indeed still correlate with positive organizational outcomes.

How we measured business outcomes

We used the following key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the relative outcomes of different cohorts.

↗ Revenue trends for Q1 2025

↗ Projected revenue trends for 2025

↗ Employee retention

↗ Frequency of disruptive events, including:

– Restructuring

– Layoffs

– Mergers and acquisitions

– Expansion into a new market

– Launching a new product/service

– Sunsetting a market

– Sunsetting a product/service

Employee and leadership optimism about company outlook

Business strategy alignment with talent, execution, and technology strategy.

Net Promoter Score (NPS)—adjusted to “Would you reapply for your job?”

These measures were drawn from existing thought leadership and in-depth conversations with business leaders, subject matter experts, and analysts from diverse industries.

Previous page
Next page